Learning Center

We keep you up-to-date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Luxury Second Homes Tax: The "Taylor Swift" Debate

The term "Taylor Swift tax" carries with it not just celebrity allure but also engages serious housing policy discussion.

Rhode Island is considering imposing a new surcharge targeting luxury second homes that aren't the primary residences of their owners. Citing Realtor.com, the proposal suggests that non-owner-occupied residences valued above $1 million will pay an additional $2.50 per $500 beyond the initial million. For instance, homeowners of a $2 million property might face $5,000 in extra yearly taxes. This policy, effective July 2026, also factors in inflation adjustments starting in mid-2027. However, exempt from this surcharge are properties rented for over 183 days annually.

Understanding the "Taylor Swift Tax" Moniker

While not a formal legislative term, "Taylor Swift tax" has gained traction as media shorthand because Taylor Swift's opulent mansion in Watch Hill, Rhode Island, valued at an estimated $17 million, would incur around $136,000 extra annually under the new rule. This term serves to highlight broader implications affecting all luxury secondary residences, not just her own.

The residence, known as "High Watch," boasts a storied heritage. Initially constructed for the Snowden family around the late 1920s, it was later owned by Rebekah Harkness of the Standard Oil lineage, celebrated for hosting grand parties. Following ownership shifts, Taylor Swift acquired the property in 2013, drawing inspiration for her 2020 music piece, "The Last Great American Dynasty.”

Image 1

Support and Controversy in the Legislative Arena

Senator Meghan Kallman, a proponent, shared with Newsweek that the initiative champions fairness: “The proposed surcharge would aid Rhode Island in securing much-needed financial resources, averting cuts in vital sectors such as healthcare and education,” primarily because many luxury homes are owned by out-of-state buyers contributing minimally to the state's economy.

Image 2

Advocates believe these measures could revitalize "lights-out" neighborhoods, fostering increased residency, while channeling additional revenue towards affordable housing development. Conversely, critics, particularly from the real estate sector, caution against unforeseen repercussions. They argue it might dissuade investments in high-end properties, potentially depress property values, or coerce homeowners—especially those with long-standing familial ties—to sell.

The lively discussions and notable moniker, as captured by Dave Portnoy of Barstool Sports, underline the tax's spotlight. Portnoy humorously suggested Massachusetts could contemplate a “Dave Portnoy tax.”

Impending Decisions and Broader Implications

Though still a proposal, if sanctioned, property owners have until mid-2026 to show they reside in the state more than 183 days or actively lease their homes, avoiding the surcharge. The plan mixes incentives and penalties to nurture either higher occupancy or revenue generation, with tax prosecutions as potential enforcers.

The intrigue isn't confined to Rhode Island. For instance, Montana seeks to allocate more property tax responsibilities to non-resident second-home owners, especially Californians. While lacking a statewide “Taylor Swift tax,” California's Los Angeles endorsed Measure ULA, imposing a mansion tax on luxury sales—4% for $5-$10 million transactions and 5.5% for higher ones.

Further North, South Lake Tahoe's petition under Measure N introduces taxing vacation homes vacant over six months yearly, promising funds for affordable housing and local enhancements. Nearby, several locales, including Oakland, Berkeley, and San Francisco, have similar initiatives but with differential efficacy and legal vulnerabilities.

Image 3

States like Rhode Island, Montana, and various Californian territories continue exploring taxation strategies aimed at optimizing housing utilization and fiscal contribution frameworks. Whether it stands as an economic asset or mere catchphrase remains a point of interested observation for both supporters and critics.

Share this article...

Want our best tax and accounting tips and insights delivered to your inbox?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .