Learning Center

We keep you up-to-date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

The Implications of Michigan's New Cannabis Tax Legal Battle

Michigan has found itself at the forefront of a pivotal dispute over cannabis taxation, instigated by a controversial 24% wholesale marijuana tax. This new levy is currently under legal scrutiny with allegations of constitutional violation. As the initial court proceedings begin, the focus is not just on its ramifications for marijuana pricing but also on how it might set a precedent for modifying voter-endorsed legislations and tax frameworks nationwide.

Image 1

Regardless of your location or involvement with cannabis, this case holds significance. It has the potential to guide how states may formulate, adjust, and uphold cannabis taxes, while also offering insight into upcoming legal challenges as the cannabis industry evolves.

Understanding Michigan's Proposal

As part of its fiscal blueprint for 2025–2026, Michigan's legislative body sanctioned a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, intended to funnel funds into road infrastructure. This tax targets the supply chain pre-retail.

Currently, Michigan imposes two additional taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on retail cannabis purchases, as sanctioned by voters in 2018.

  • A 6% state sales tax, potentially leading to one of the most complex cannabis tax frameworks in the U.S. if the wholesale tax is implemented.

Image 2

The Industry's Legal Standpoint

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) has challenged the tax's constitutionality, contending that modifying the 2018 voter-approved legislation requires a supermajority vote, a threshold not met when the wholesale tax was ratified by a simple majority.

MCIA's spokesperson, Rose Tantraphol, emphasized their stance: "As the primary cannabis trade association, we stand in court to defend the directives of Michigan voters." (Source: Michigan Advance)

Further concerns arise from the industry regarding potential cost hikes, pressures on small enterprises, and a possible resurgence of unregulated markets—an observed consequence in states with high taxes like California.

State Motivations and Justifications

Michigan's administration defends the legality of the tax based on its novel status and distinct purpose:

  • The tax is independent, not an amendment to the 2018 decision.

  • The legislative assembly holds the authority to impose taxes for budgetary allocations.

  • The tax's goal is primarily the development of road infrastructure.

Pending a favorable judicial decision, the tax is scheduled to be enacted on January 1, 2026.

Image 3

Consumer Impact and Broader Implications

This development is not restricted to Michigan but holds potential influence for nationwide cannabis tax models. Should the tax hold up in court:

  • Wholesale and retail cannabis prices may rise.

  • Consumers might pivot to more affordable, illicit options.

  • Smaller cannabis businesses could face significant operational challenges or may resort to consolidation.

Should the tax be invalidated, Michigan’s existing taxation system—already deemed cost-effective—would remain untouched.

National Significance of Michigan's Legal Battle

Even though initiated in Michigan, the case's outcome could have extensive repercussions:

  • Testing Voter-Approved Law Integrity: The ability for legislators to impose taxes without broad consensus might alter the flexibility of voter initiatives.

  • Guiding Other States' Tax Legislation: States with infrastructure deficits might emulate similar fiscal policies if Michigan's stance is upheld.

  • Highlighting Tax Rate Discrepancies: Through this case, disparities in national cannabis taxation become evident, influencing how states balance revenue generation and market regulation.

This legal scenario could set a benchmark for future taxation discourse within and beyond U.S. borders.

Next Steps in the Legal Process

Following preliminary discussions, a Michigan Court of Claims judge is poised to deliver a ruling soon. This case might ascend to the Michigan Supreme Court, receiving significant attention on its progression and potential outcomes.

The verdict reached will have substantial effects on cannabis operations within Michigan, crafting a precedent on managing voter-sanctioned legislation, emergent sectors, and state fiscal prerogatives nationwide.

Share this article...

Want our best tax and accounting tips and insights delivered to your inbox?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .